alltecCasella di testo: ANY THING WHICH IS HAPPENING IN THIS WORLD IS OUR BUSINESS

Casella di testo:

 

 

 

 

 

Casella di testo: Realistically, women have only got one hope when it comes to having a happy future. They will have to learn to cater for their men in a way in which other men cannot do. And if they do not do this, they are toast. They will have nothing else to offer. The converse, however, is not true. Men do not have to taste good to women to be of value to them. Without men - nothing. No houses or factories would be built or maintained. No roads would be constructed. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc.  Nothing! It is men who create, construct, develop, operate and maintain just about everything that represents the progress of humans on this planet. Fundamentally, in essence, and going to the nub of it all, what the future holds for women will boil down to this. They will have to taste good to men. They will have nothing else going for them. And if they do not taste good to men then there will be no point in men having them around. To summarise: When their baby baggery days are over - which is not so very far away - women will have to offer men something that other men cannot offer them.  As such, they alienate men at their peril. Of course, a good supper is always a joy to have. But one can always live quite happily without one or, better still, find other meals that are equally satisfying. And, quite frankly, if women are going to lie, cheat and steal - as per the above survey - not to mention all the other horrible things that they get up to - then it really does look as if they are heading for a fall of considerable magnitude. And, while on this particular aspect of the subject, it is worth noting that these stupid women - e.g. the feminists and those working in the abuse industry - who continually stir up hatred toward men in one way or another are setting their whole gender up for the most monumental backlash against women. Ordinary women should not be supporting these people. And the same goes for those politically-corrected short-sighted narrow-minded buffoons - particularly of the male variety - who keep trying to protect 'women' with their various inane platitudes about them. They will simply be contributing to this backlash. Loosely speaking, if enough men feel that they are being cheated, lied to, disempowered, demonised or discriminated against etc etc, then there is going to be trouble! Big. Trouble.  

Casella di testo: And it is because of this 'male' brain growth that feminists have absolutely no hope of surviving as a significant force for very long, and why women really do need to watch their step. You see, in the past, men have always had to be nice to their women in order for their societies to cater as best as they could for their needs and desires. And in places where men were not nice to their women, their societies and their cultures did not get very far. But, in the future, men might well not have to be so nice in order to guarantee the success of their societies - and themselves!  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Casella di testo: Men are not going to continue putting up with the mistreatment that they are receiving at the hands of the authorities. And one thing that these authorities will NEVER be able to protect themselves from is the men's movement. This is just not possible. The movement is infiltrating itself everywhere. Yes. Progress is painfully slow. But it is happening. And it is happening everywhere. The consciousness of 'men' is expanding. The organism is growing. And it will dwarf absolutely any other organism on this planet. It is only a question of time.                                                                                                                                                             

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Casella di testo:   FROM SITE: angryharry.com Vibrators   Women Are Having Orgasm Problems Women, apparently, are having difficulty reaching orgasms these days; with some huge percentage of them failing to achieve orgasms when engaging in normal sex. And, needless to say, AH knows why; though, of course, he has never come across a woman who cannot orgasm. No sirree! Everyone of them has writhed and bucked and rodeoed their way to ecstasy when he has done his thing. (Actually, AH is lying at this point - for effect!) The secret is to find that little red cotton bud no matter how hard it tries to hide or to slip away.  You can't feel it. You can't see it. You can't even hear it.  But you know it's there! You know it's there because if it wasn't there it wouldn't have a name.  And the secret of sexcess is to chase it round and round and to freak it out before it dries out. And therein, of course, lies Catch 22. Because it's not until the damn thing actually dries out that you can actually locate it and pursue it hither and thither with any degree of accuracy before it slips away into the dark abyss. But by then it's too late! If you do any zizzing at this point in time you will have to put up with all that Ouch Youch Oooch nonsense. And, Oooo, it's sore. You see, the real trick to satisfying a woman is to find the right kind of woman in the first place. The kind that will writhe and buck and rodeo without too much effort. It's easy to spot such women. They have a certain look about them.  It's difficult to describe that give-away look in detail only with words, but the word 'desperate' pretty much sums it up. And if she looks like Sylvester Stallone, so much the better, because you will save yourself hours of sexual time - which you can then use to get a better education - a couple of degrees perhaps. But there is an interesting question here. How come men evolved to orgasm with penile penetration whereas women did not? Eh? Why? What was the point? Well. It is obvious that if men did not orgasm through penetration then they would not reproduce any of their genes. In fact, such men would have disappeared. Only men who orgasmed during penetration produced any offspring! But why were women designed to orgasm through the clitoris rather than through penetration? After all, not only does its stimulation not involve penetration, it actually excludes penetration - pretty much. What was the evolutionary point of this? How come we ended up with the women that we got? And here is a possible answer. By making women orgasm fully only in the company of men who gave them a great deal of 'attention', evolution ensured that they would stick around only those hominids who appeared most likely to want to look after them. And women who did this survived better than women who did not! In other words, thanks to natural selection, the females of our species who currently grace us with their unwholesome presence were specifically designed not to become ecstatic solely on the basis of penetration. These thankless hussies were designed to become ecstatic on the basis of something which requires a great deal of effort and which, in fact, pretty much excludes penetration at the time. Their sexual apparatus is mostly excited by a process that requires men to put an effort into something that does not also sexually reward themselves. The wiring of the scheming brains of current-day womenfolk has been arranged according to the following heinous principles. I orgasm only when the man puts in sexual effort without rewarding himself. Therefore, I am only attracted to the man who puts in sexual effort without rewarding himself. Therefore, I love only the man who puts in sexual effort without rewarding himself. Therefore, I partner only the man who puts in sexual effort without rewarding himself. And when Man was emerging from apedom, the proto-women who did not attach themselves to men who put in the extra sexual effort without rewarding themselves, made the wrong choice! They cavorted happily with those men who would abandon them!  And so their offspring did not survive well. And so their descendants are not here. Well, you get the picture. Clever eh? And this is why the women that we ended up with require all this clitoral stimulation - and all the lovey duvvy stuff. Their orgasms depend on being pandered to! Indeed, generally speaking, the more 'unpleasant' are the experiences that someone 'willingly' wades through in order to give another an 'orgasm', the more 'under their spell' they must be! And now, of course, with oodles of western women available here, there and everywhere, western men do not need to exert too much effort in order to fulfill their own rapacious desires. And with feminists also successfully urging women to behave as if they are superior to men - when they are not - the men simply cannot be bothered to exert themselves too much. What is the point? And this is why there now seems to be an epidemic of non-orgasmic women in the west. The men are not a-pandering. Well done feminism! Of course, there is now a variety of gadgets on the market to help women with their orgasm problems; vibrators being the most common. But the truth is that these, on their own, are not hugely satisfying for women even if they do succeed in bringing themselves to orgasm with them. Good sex - great sex - is, after all, as much of a mental activity as it is a physical one. And vibrators are only useful in providing a MacDonald's kind of sex. Yes. Their burgers taste good. But there is a whole paraphernalia of various tastes that is missing. And the same sort of thing is true when vibrators take the place of men. Generally speaking, the majority of men and women only have great sex when they 'own' each other in some significant way. (The word 'own' might not be quite the right word to use, but it's a pretty good one!) However, thanks to feminism, this kind of relationship is being killed off. And so, of course women are having orgasm problems!