Casella di testo: Pizzey's book "Prone to Violence", which is now on the www, http://www.bennett.com/ptv/index.shtml   http://www.fathersforlife.org/fv/ptv.htm The book they suppressed in England! The emotional terrorist & the violence-prone, by Erin Pizzey http://www.ivorcatt.com/03a.htm   Casella di testo: There are three categories; violent male, violent female, violent pair. Pizzey calls the last group "mutual combat". A member of a violent pair which splits up will gravitate towards a second violent partner. Returning to the first two categories, the number of violent women exceeds the number of men who initiate violence. See Fiebert; http://www.electromagnetism.demon.co.uk/07088.htm; "....women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners. The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 60,000. "    alltec

Casella di testo: SECONDARY SEX Stupid white women Female Anatomy for Guys What ever man does .... Never discuss with.. Some points.. These parasites and black men Women talk for talking... Sex is only thing for them.. Casella di testo:

                                                                                                                                                          

 

 

 

Casella di testo: Feminist’s equality:   The word “equality for all” is like arsenic for feminists. When equality comes in, the feminist dies. Logically she never let that condition to verify. She can lives till creates inequality conditions, for men and for women. Feminist sees equality as a last step of her life, so we should never reach to it. She does this with any means available.                  There is not such a “politically correct” in her life. She does any thing even kills her enemy which is “equality” and any one who wants it, men or women. Have you ever heard or read some where from them some things like: “No this is too much for women”  (lies, most of their head ideologist are men)    “We should consider also other half of the population” “She should have the same treatment in front of the law” “Equal opportunity for both” “The boys are as good as girls” “The privacy is a right for both” “Dad can be as good as mom” “Both should have equal rights regarding children” “Also she should pay for a date” “Even she shouldn’t tell lies or cheats” “She can be as violent as man in home” “Also she can be guilty “ And so on….so on That is what they mean.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Casella di testo:  Steve Rozen, one of the leading scientists on the project, says the Y chromosome has a robust life expectancy. As it turns out, men have an extra brain gene that females do not possess. Nobody knows what it does yet - although it is bound to attract stereotypical jokes about parking and map-reading. On the serious side, the gene must have played a key role in the evolution of mankind for it to exist in the genome today. "It is in a part of the Y chromosome that was acquired in the last few million years since humans and chimpanzees split," says Rozen, of Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, US. He speculates the gene provided some sort of evolutionary advantage in the path from chimps to modern humans. Chimps parted company from humans more than five million years ago. The Y chromosome itself has been around much longer - some 300 million years. During this time, it has fought an ancient battle of the sexes with the X chromosome. Now and again, genes on the Y are "overwritten" by similar genes on the X. This has cost the Y hundreds of genes over the years. But the way the genes are arranged means that if a critical gene is damaged, it has a partner it can swap with. "This study shows the Y chromosome has become very efficient at preserving its important genes," says Richard Wilson, director of the Genome Sequencing Center at the Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis   Casella di testo: If you want to find an example of ultra-successful brainwashing of the public by the media, you need look no further than the subject of domestic violence; though I have to admit that child abuse runs it a close second. If you ask the man-in-the-street what he thinks domestic violence is, he will probably tell you that it is men attacking women within the family. If you further ask him why he thinks this, he will tell you that he has heard it many times in TV news broadcasts, read about it in newspapers and magazines and has seen adverts about it on television.   Exactly! In a word he has been brainwashed and, sadly, he is by no means alone; he is in the company of his wife, his neighbours, his childrenıs teachers, his bank manager and countless politicians. They are all totally ignorant of the true facts about domestic violence in this country. So where can these poor beleaguered souls discover the truth about this important problem which constantly batters their ears and eyeballs? The sad answer is, itıs all around them if only they use their eyes and their ears.   In January 1999 the UK Governmentıs Home Office published the results of a survey into domestic violence. It was the biggest ever carried out anywhere in the world and involved more than 10,000 men and women. It was called Study 191 and it stated, quite categorically, that 4.2% of men and 4.2% of women perpetrate the crime of domestic violence. In other words they had discovered that men and women are equally violent.   Surprised? Donıt be. It's nothing new and to my knowledge (and to anyone else's who has researched the matter) it has been known for at least 30 years.   The persistent claim that the overwhelming majority of victims of domestic violence are women is not supported by any impartial research, either in the UK or elsewhere. The results of all reputable gender-neutral studies of domestic violence in couple relationships, published to date, indicate that there is an almost equal numerical culpability between men and women.   We hear much today about the need for womenıs refuges where all those women who are regularly beaten up by men can flee with their children. The first such refuge in this country (indeed in the world) was opened by Erin Pizzey in London, back in 1971. She was a feminist and thought that women needed to be helped. But in her book Prone to Violence, published in 1982, she stated that, of the first 100 women who entered that refuge, 64 of them were as violent, or more violent, than the men they were allegedly running away from.   So with this evidence available for over 20 years, why are the public and the politicians so ignorant of it? The simple answer is: the book was censored. Erin Pizzey received death threats from feminists in the UK who, at that time, were riding on the crest of a powerful wave, and Erin had to leave the country.   I first heard about the book eight years ago so I decided to buy a copy. I was told that it was out of print. I decided to try the massive Internet booksellers Amazon who boasted that they could supply any book. When I visited their site I asked for the titles of all the books written by Erin Pizzey (sheıs written about 12). Down scrolled a list of all her books - all except Prone to Violence. Strange! Are you now thinking the unthinkable, that book censorship is alive and well in the UK? You are so right!   Having failed to buy a copy, I decided to borrow one. I tried my local library but they told me that they did not have a copy. I therefore filled in the necessary card, and paid the fee, for them to borrow a copy from another library in the UK. I was eventually informed that there was not a single copy of the book in any library in the country. Fortunately, having had experience in the publishing business, I knew that a copy of every book published in the UK has to be sent, free, to the National Library, by the publisher. I told my library this and asked them to borrow a copy from them. They did, and I was eventually able to read the book. A year or so later, Prone to Violence was published on the Internet. The censorship had eventually failed and now anyone can download the entire book free.   Now that governments and other agencies can no longer censor books which appear on the internet, does it surprise you that we constantly hear now of how much damage being on the Internet does to children? Increasingly politicians and other censorship agents are trying to take some sort of control of the Internet no matter how feeble the reason. Freedom to think is a constant threat to politicians.   This complete censorship of domestic violence has now been replaced by a one-sided presentation of the facts of domestic violence with the feminist spin machine presenting carefully selected facts to present to the public in an effort to suggest that domestic violence is a sex issue, and not showing it in its true colours as a social issue.   Violence in couple relationships has always existed. Some examples of male victims include Abraham Lincoln, and more recently, Humphrey Bogart and John Wayne, to name but a few. But do you think any of these gentlemen would want it noised abroad that they were attacked by their wives? I hardly think so. Just imagine what such publicity would have done to their macho images. And here we have a genuine problem but one which is slowly being solved.   Men donıt like to admit that they are attacked by their wives or girlfriends; hence they are loathe to admit it. In the UK the menıs civil rights charity, Mankind, has over the past year, set up help lines for male victims all over the country. How many calls do they get? One of the men who mans one of the lines recently told me that he gets on average 15 every day; and that's only in one area of the south of England.   I know four men who have suffered domestic violence at the hands of their wives. The first woke up one morning to find his wife sitting on the side of his bed, striking matches and throwing them on the sheets in an effort to set him alight, another told me of the time he was left lying injured and bleeding on the floor of his kitchen, after being attacked by his wife, and when the police arrived, they stepped over him to go to his wife to ask if she was all right. A third man had his skull and several ribs fractured by his wife using an iron bar, but still stayed with her until the day she put crushed glass in his dinner. When blood started pouring out of his mouth, he realised it was time to move out. A fourth stands at six feet four, is a black belt in karate and his wife constantly bombards him with verbal abuse. He will not hit her because he knows very well that if he does the police will immediately arrest him and make him leave his home.   If you wish to delve further into the truth about domestic violence, I suggest you obtain a copy of The A to Z of D.V. complied by Martin S Fiebert, Ph.D. of the Department of Psychology, California State University. This is a collection of 95 scholarly investigations, 79 empirical studies and 16 reviews and analyses, covering over 60,000 case studies. Together, this massive volume of evidence proves beyond doubt that women are as physically aggressive, if not more so, in relationships with their spouses than men. All this is freely available on the Internet.   The majority of male victims feel that the police and social agencies are generally unsympathetic to their plight and in some cases antagonistic. A Dispatches programme, broadcast in the UK on 7th January 1999 reported on the experiences of 100 male victims of domestic violence and found that: 30% had been attacked while asleep; 25% had been kicked in the genitals; 25% of the male victims had themselves been arrested after seeking police help, and 89% felt that the police had not taken their complaints seriously. Only 7% of the female assailants had been arrested and none was subsequently charged.   Despite the huge body of research I have referred to above, the assumption that women are always the victims and men the victimisers still largely underpins government and public policy and is the reason for giving many millions of pounds of public money to women's groups and refuges every year, and none to help male victims. There are over 445 refuges for battered women in England and Wales where women can flee and take their children. At the moment, in the UK there are just two refuges for men, one opened in December 2003 and the other, which is the only one exclusively for men, in January 2004.   Given the foregoing it is not surprising that men do not report instances of domestic violence against them, and it is this problem that the UK men's rights charity Mankind is now busy addressing. Their DV posters are being increasingly seen in police stations, libraries and on notice-boards as more and more people are becoming aware of the truth of the situation and are willing to help. One of the posters shows a man with an injured face bearing the caption, The garage door he bumped into last night was female. This is an attempt to urge men to report domestic violence as readily as women do. The latest surveys show that women are five times more likely than men to report domestic violence against them.   Domestic violence is not a sex issue, it is a social issue, and until both sides of the problem are acknowledged and addressed by those who claim to be concerned about the matter, no cure will be found.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Casella di testo: The desire of sex that life did put in our bodies was to assure his goals, mankind survival.  Naturally he put more and more of this desire in women. He has to convince her to be pregnant with all danger which she had to front in past times. So when it comes to sexual desire, life did put that force much higher than he put it in men. How many men do you know that do sex knowing all the probability of dead after that? They have such a great desire that they don’t know how to handle it. Look all those feminists great propaganda about “female orgasm”, “multiorgasms”, “G spot”, “C spot”, “F spot”, “vagina-day”, “vagina –night”, “vagina-midday”……and so on.  “ This is what really they are. All vagina, one in place of head one between the legs.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Casella di testo: So a T-shirt with a violent slogan doesn't have any effect? OK, WE'll print one that says, "Women are scum -- shoot them." AFTER..  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Casella di testo: Genitalists (feminists) looking for a new name for woman: See that they wanted to eliminate all men, his name is also should be eliminated. So from WO-MEN will remains only “WO” that should be added to some thing. They should replace the name “men” with some thing else. We want to anticipate and help to this event so we could propose for ex: 1-wogina (wo + vagina) 2-wovibra (wo + vibrator) 3-wobitch (business one) 4-worgasm (world salvation feminist way) 5-wopuss (banker and capitalist) 6-wolie (scientists and researchers) 7-woallme (all for them) 8-woladen (terrorist politically correct) 9-wolaban (Afghan ways politically correct) 10- Hi Hitler (says all) Which one do you think is more suited?  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Casella di testo: What Women Want: Who Cares?    "In any event, based solely on my feedback to date, I would be hard pressed to make any general conclusions other than this:  Many men today simply don’t care what women want. .... may have appeared to lay the blame for this situation on women in general, but it is my contention that the FemiNaZi are largely responsible. Many smart women (and men) have already figured this out. The glory years of the FemiNaZi are fading and the end is near. Thank God."

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                       

 

 

                                                                                                                                                   

 

Casella di testo: AMERICA OF HILLYBILLY!!!!!!!!